Marks, mentoring, grievances and certificates are recorded as people work, so the numbers an assessor asks for already exist. Below is every area we cover, with what runs in production today and what doesn't.
NAAC has stopped new grading under its Revised Accreditation Framework and proposed two new tracks: Basic (Binary) Accreditation and Maturity-Based Graded Levels. In its April 2026 notice both were still proposed, and no new criteria or metric list had been published.
Whatever the final form, assessors will still ask for the same records: outcome attainment, mentoring, feedback, grievance redressal and results. So we group the evidence below by the seven criteria institutions already know, and will map it to the new framework when NAAC publishes it.
NBA now asks UG engineering programmes for a fresh self-assessment report on e-NBA. Its 2026 Tier I manual has nine criteria and 11 programme outcomes.
NAAC
Grouped by the seven criteria institutions already work to, so your IQAC can see where each record helps.
Criterion 1
Assessors look for structured feedback on the curriculum and action taken on it.
Criterion 2
The heaviest criterion: enrolment, learner support, mentoring, evaluation and outcome attainment.
Criterion 3
Publications, citations and research profiles for every faculty member.
Criterion 4
Evidence that ICT and e-learning are used in teaching, not just installed.
Criterion 5
Grievance redressal, support schemes and what happens to students after they leave.
Criterion 6
E-governance across offices and an IQAC that works from real numbers.
Criterion 7
Gender sensitivity, wellbeing and a safe campus, with records to show for it.
NBA and outcome-based education
Map outcomes once; every assessment after that feeds attainment without a spreadsheet.
Outcomes
The base of every NBA self-assessment: course outcomes mapped to programme outcomes.
Attainment
Attainment worked out from marks, not typed into a spreadsheet the week before the visit.
Continuous improvement
Evidence that targets were set, missed targets were reviewed and something was done.
UGC and national systems
UGC 2023
Committees, deadlines and appeals for every grievance, with a register you can produce.
ABC · APAAR · DigiLocker
National IDs captured once and documents verified at source.
Certificates
Employers and other universities check a certificate without writing to you.
NIRF · AISHE
The numbers these returns ask for live in Intelversity; the returns themselves are filed by you.
Self-check
Eight statements. Answer each one, and every "not yet" points at the module that keeps that evidence.
No. It keeps the records and works out the numbers, such as attainment, pass percentages and mentor ratios, and exports them to Excel and PDF. Your IQAC writes and submits the report.
Yes. The new framework had not been published when we last checked, but every version so far asks for evidence of outcomes, mentoring, feedback and grievance redressal. We will map our records to the new criteria once NAAC publishes them.
Course-outcome attainment from internal and end-semester marks works the same way. The one-click PO list is the earlier 12-PO set; the 2026 manual uses 11, and programme educational objectives (PEOs) are not in Intelversity yet. Tell us which manual your programme follows and we will show you how it fits.
NBA's 2026 manual does not prescribe a weighting; 80:20 is common practice. Indirect attainment comes from course-exit surveys, which we switch on per institution. Tell us the weighting your programme uses.
Grievances have committees, deadlines and an appeal stage, and can be filed anonymously. Named SGRC and Ombudsperson roles with the statutory day limits are not built yet; in the meantime you can set up your SGRC as a committee.
Yes. The demo runs on a sample institution with fictional data, set up with your programmes, outcomes and terms, so your IQAC sees its own structure.
We walk your IQAC coordinator through attainment, mentoring and grievance records on a sample institution with fictional data.
